Site icon The Observer

Auburn City Council rejects annexation of 178 acres

Auburn City Council

Auburn City Council in its meeting chambers.

BY DANIEL SCHMIDT FOR THE OBSERVER

AUBURN — Nearly 200 acres north of U.S. Highway 280 will remain a part of unincorporated Lee County after opposition from nearby residents tanked a proposal to rezone and incorporate the property into the city of Auburn.
The Auburn City Council on Dec. 17 unanimously voted against that measure, which would have incorporated the 178 acres and applied the conservation overlay district designation to the currently rural land.
Before the vote, Ward 3 Council Member Beth Witten said the city’s planning staff giving the property low priority for annexation and opposition against the plan would cause her to vote against it. She later added annexing the future subdivision would also place further strain on city services including school buses, garbage collection and water.
The council’s decision will not impact development of the proposed Asheton Glenn Subdivision, which is a use by right. The Auburn Planning Commission approved the 21-lot final plat at its Nov. 14 meeting, although the property could eventually include up to 59 residential lots.
The applicant’s concept plan shows 59 total residential lots, which are mostly concentrated toward the property’s western boundary.
Currently, the city’s conservation overlay district ordinance encourages the conservation of water and other natural resources by allowing developers to build denser neighborhoods on less land. According to documents included in last Tuesday’s meeting, the typical lot size in the proposed development will be 1.2 acres.
At the meeting, concerned residents who live near the property presented a range of arguments against annexing it into the city and against the development of the land into a subdivision entirely.
In light of recent outrage over a developer cutting down a tree and destroying a bald eagle nest in north Auburn, Melissa Wheelis asked the council if the developer could be trusted to responsibility build on the property.
“It seems to me that this comes down to trust. Are we to trust that an out-of-town developer will have our best interest at heart in the city of Auburn, or would it seem more logical for the developer to ensure his is profitable?” Wheelis said. “I believe we all recently learned the hard way with the eagle debacle that not all developers can be trusted, and some are bad actors.”
Tamara Kett then claimed the change would give developers a “legal loophole” to build homes on one-acre lots in areas where individual homeowners and home builders must build homes on at least three acres. According to Lee County’s current subdivision and land development regulations, the county health department’s regulations currently determine the minimum lot size to be able to build on.
“To me that indicates that opposition to this kind of rezoning and development is far wider than our neighborhood alone, because everybody in a rurally zoned land in or adjacent to Auburn recognizes that their rural tranquility will be vulnerable to exploitation by developers,” Kett said.
Toward the end of the public comment period, Dave Patrick voiced concerns about water around the proposed development. He said his house has lost access to water at least five times in the past 10 years due to power and pump failures, later adding an inability to secure the water supply could pose safety and health risks.
“We have a serious water problem in that area, and the density that we’re seeing on the south side of [Highway 280] is going to cause us problems,” Patrick said. “I believe maybe a moratorium on home building should be considered until that water tower is completed.”
It is currently unclear when construction of the subdivision will begin.
In other news, the council resolved several other items of business:

Exit mobile version